DAVID ROACH 4 MAYOR REPUBLICAN FORT WAYNE : DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGES V 2.0 ( AND LAWYERS)

X
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1.
IN THE MATTER OF
02C01-1503-MI-000256
JUDGE STANLEY ABRAM LEVINE- MUST DISQUALIFY HIMSELF; SUA SPONDE; ASAP.
I ALSO HEREBY RESPECTFULLY THE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE STANLEY ABRAM LEVINE
- AS I REASONABLE QUESTION THE JUDGES IMPARTIALITY IN THIS MATTER DUE TO CLOSE PERSONAL AND POLITICAL TIES AND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS; AMONG WHICH IS AN ILLEGAL UNDISCLOSED $2500 UNITEMIZED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION.

IN THE MATTER OF
02C01-1505-MI-000500
JUDGE NANCY ESCHOFF- BOYER MUST DISQUALIFY HERSELF- FOR FILING A FALSE/FICTITIOUS/FRAUDULENT CAMPAIGN FINANCE STATEMENT- CFA- as per warning at bottom of page- s filing such statement is a class D felony- Perjury.

I ALSO HEREBY RESPECTFULLY THE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE
NANCY ESCHOFF BOYER
AS I REASONABLE QUESTION THE JUDGES IMPARTIALITY IN THIS MATTER-
DUE TO AN ILLEGALLY FILLED OUT AND FILED AND SIGNED UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY- that of reporting ZERO DOLLARS RAISED AND SPENT. THAT IS A PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY; and raises questions of the potential appearance of impropriety of said CFA-

scroll down -

IN THE MATTER OF
02C01-1503-MI-000256
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
02C01-1505-MI-000500

I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE ALLEN COUNTY ELECTION BOARD ATTORNEY- CARRIE HAWK GUTMAN RECUSE DISQUALIFY HERSELF FROM BOTH MATTERS BECAUSE AS EITHER AN EMPLOYEE OF THE ACEB; OR A CONTRACTOR TO THE ACEB-
HER LAW FIRM HAS MADE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MAYORS ELECTION CAMPAIGNS( GILMORE HAYNIE JR)-

AND- HER LAW FIRM REPRESENTS VARIOUS BUSINESS INTEREST OWNED BY THE HENRY SYNDICATE OF FAMILY BUSINESSES.

X
X

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
JUDGE LEVINE SHOULD RECUSE/DISQUALIFY
HIMSELF SUA SPONDE- per judicIal canon
Who needs the headaches? wash your hands of this and pass the buck..
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

13- FURTHERMORE- SPECIAL JUDGE LEVINE SHOULD RECUSE
DISQUALIFY
HIMSELF SUA SPONDE
"C. DISQUALIFICATION.

(1) A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned... ."

Jud. Canon 1 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY.

An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing, and should himself observe, high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved. The provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that objective without any limitation upon the Supreme Court in the exercise of its power of general superintendence, whether statutory or inherent, in areas not delineated in the Code.

[4] Jud. Canon 2 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL HIS ACTIVITIES.

A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

1. due to his close personal and political ties to the Henry family and "THOMAS Charles HENRY"; -campaign contributions from a Henry family member who is also a business secretary/corporate officer/partner with "Thomas Charles Henry".

2- due to an illegal $2500 dollar "unitemized campaign contribution"- from a clearly undisclosed source- far above and beyond the legal limit for
unitemized campaign contributions. I would not characterize this as a "bribe"; but I would characterize this as 25X $100 DOLLAR BILLS IN AN UNDISCLOSED, UNITEMIZED , ENVELOPE.

3- Judicial Canons require the scrupulous avoidance of the appearance of impropriety. I think Recusal would allow the Judge to wash his hands of this and any talk of "conspiracy" by the voters in future elections.
x
Matter of Drury, 602 NE 2d 1000 - Ind: Supreme Court 1992
JUDGES AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS
*1011 The requirement that judges report their financial transactions is designed to protect the litigants and lawyers who appear before such judges. Statements of Economic Interests alert parties to the potential prejudices of judges, thereby creating a checks and balances system which promotes an objective judiciary and enhances the perception of fairness in the courts. Failure to correctly report financial transactions as required is more than a bureaucratic misstep: it is a breach of the system by which we, as judges, maintain our honesty.
x
X
HERE COME DE JUDGE

1] Jud. Canon 5 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD REGULATE HIS EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF CONFLICT WITH HIS JUDICIAL DUTIES.

C. FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES.

(1) A judge should refrain from financial and business dealings that tend to reflect adversely on his impartiality, interfere with the proper performance of his judicial duties, exploit his judicial position, or involve him in frequent transactions with lawyers or persons likely to come before the court on which he serves.

(4) Neither a judge nor a member of his family residing in his household should accept a gift, bequest, favor, or loan from anyone except as follows:

(c) a judge or a member of his family residing in his household may accept any other gift, bequest, favor, or loan only if the donor is not a party or other person whose interests have come or are likely to come before him, and, if its value exceeds $100, the judge reports it in the same manner as he reports compensation in Canon 6C.

[2] Jud. Canon 3 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF HIS OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY.

The judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all his other activities. His judicial duties include all the duties of his office prescribed by law. In the performance of these duties, the following standards apply:

C. DISQUALIFICATION.

(1) A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned... .

[3] Jud. Canon 1 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY.

[4] Jud. Canon 2 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL HIS ACTIVITIES.

A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

X
x
anything over 100 bucks must be reported.. a 2500 dollar unitemized campaign contribution would surely fall in to this category?
(c) a judge or a member of his family residing in his household may accept any other gift, bequest, favor, or loan only if the donor is not a party or other person whose interests have come or are likely to come before him, and, if its value exceeds $100, the judge reports it in the same manner as he reports compensation in Canon 6C.
x
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
EVIDENCE: SCREEN SHOTS OF JUDGE LEVINE DOCUMENTING "CLOSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIMSELF AND HENRY FAMILY MEMBERS/ BUSINESS SYNDICATE

"QUOTE"- "MAYOR HENRY IS ALSO A SUPPORTER".
well- what about me? I reasonably question Judge Levines impartiality in this matter.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"quote"- see post: Nice photo of Judge Levine and Jerome "Jerry" Henry jr- SUPPORTER AND PRESIDENT OF MIDWEST PIPE AND STEEL- A HENRY FAMILY SYNDICATE BUSINESS- AND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTORS- Midwest pipe and steel; ; AND INDIVIDUALLY.
approx. 10%- 1000 dollars- 400 dollars and 500 dollars campaign contributions..
the Mayors brother- "- that would be Mayor Thomas "Tom" (Charles? Christopher? Cobblepott?) C. Henry.

due to the personal and politically close relationship between the Henry family- and Mayor Henry;
I reasonably question Judge Levines impartiality in this matter.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

JUDGE LEVINE ALSO HAS A CLOSE PERSONAL AND POLITICAL RELATIONSHIP WITH RESPONDENT RICHARD "RICK" STEVENSON- Wayne Township Trustee.
I reasonably question Judge Levines impartiality in this matter.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NAMES AND PHOTOS OF PAST FORT WAYNE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO SERVED ON CITY COUNCIL WHEN JUDGE LEVINE WAS CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY; MAYOR HENRY WAS 3RD DISTRICT COUNCILMAN AT THE TIME UNTIL HE WAS DEFEATED BY PRESENT 3RD DISTRICT COUNCILMAN THOMAS FRANCIS "TOM" DIDIER.

xXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
x
UNITEMIZED 2500 DOLLAR CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION- WHAT IS THE SOURCE? WHO IS IT FROM? ILLEGAL DUE TO CFA REPORTING LAWS..
JUDGE LEVINE IS A LAW SCHOOL GRADUATE; AND A ALLEN COUNTY BAR ASSOC. ADMITTED MEMBER. AND HE DOESNT KNOW ELECTION LAWS; CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE LAWS? HMMM i FIND THAT DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE..
I REASONABLE QUESTION THIS UNITEMIZED CONTRIBUTION.
X

X
X
LEVINE CFA 2014

X
LEVINE CFA- MIDWEST PIPE AND STEEL- A HENRY FAMILY SYNDICATE BUSINESS-MAYOR HENRY'S BROTHER

X
x JUDGE LEVINE CFA- DIRECT CONTRIBUTION FROM MAYORS BROTHER- HENRY FAMILY BUSINESS SYNDICATE
X

X

X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
JUDGE LEVINE APPROVES AN EXPANSION OF TIME FOR ACEB ATTY UNTIL MAY11TH- 6 DAYS--AFTER-- PRIMARY ELECTION
instead of denying it- and requiring ACEB to appoint a "substitute/proxy atty for expediency; aka- before the primary election.THIS SEEMS INAPPROPRIATE TO ME. I REASONABLY QUESTION THIS ACTION. BY JUDGE LEVINE
X

X
ACTION APPROVING EXPANSION OF TIME PAST MAY5TH PRIMARY ELECTION DATE BY JUDGE LEVINE

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION BY GILMORE HAYNIE; PRINCIPLE OF HAYNIE HAWK ETC- OF WHICH CARRIE HAWK GUTMAN IS EMPLOYED AND WHO ALSO ALLEN COUNTY ELECTION BOARD MEMBER ATTY.
CONTRIBUTION TO HENRY REELECTION CAMPAIGN- RESPONDENT THOMAS C. CHARLES/CHRISTOPHER/ TOM HENRY
THE HENRY FAMILY BUSINESS SYNDICATE HAS SEVERAL LEGAL INTERESTS REPRESENTED BY THIS LAW FIRM; TO BE POSTED further down in this post.

XXXXXXXXXXXX
EVIDENCE THIS FACEBOOK PAGE AND DATE NOTED- IS JUDGE LEVINES RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN SOCIAL-MEDIA PAGE.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ENDORSEMENT BY MAYOR THOMAS C. HENRY- left column.. Supported and endorsed by respondent of which Judge Levine is to preside over this matter.
I reasonably question Judge Levines impartiality.
x

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

THIS photo/posting below: IS ILLEGAL- KNOWN AS EITHER "electioneering/politicking"; or "ghost=employment" .If FWPD Deputy Chief/FW city councilman at-large Martin A "Marty" Bender" had appeared in this photo with Judge Levine in civilian clothing; it would be legal. Judge Levine is a law school graduate admitted to the Indiana Bar to practice Law. I reasonably question Judge Levines judgement in permitting this illegal photo on this campaign social media web site..
congresswoman Jill Long was skewered politically for campaign literature in which she appeared with several uniformed law enforcement officers- ( 1990's)-how I know this is illegal. I have also filed several ACEB compaints- on file at ACEB- with respect to this same issue- most recently vs GOP candidate for sheriff David "Dave" Gladieux.
x

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
THIS POST OF PHOTO'S IS ALSO ILLEGAL UNDER THE SAME AFOREMENTIONED ELECTION LAWS- Sheriff Fries and Deputy Sheriff Gladieux- should not have appeared in a 2nd party campaign photo; in campaign literature/campaign social media sites.
X

X
by way of example- THIS PHOTO- is likely LEGAL- as its not 'POSED"; AND SO FAR AS I KNOW- HAS NOT APPEARED IN CAMPAIGN LITERATURE.
I may be wrong- this MAY be from a MaYor Thomas C. Henry social media campaign page post..or he's getting arrested.. for illegal gambling/RICO at his spouses bar. tee hee.
X

X
THOMAS CHRISTOPHER/CHARLES HENRY ARE BUSINESS PARTNERS
AND BROTHERS ( NATURALLY)
CAMPAIGN CASH IS FUNGIBLE
X
hmm- where did judgE levines re-election facebook page go? all those pretty pictures? dont worry - i saved them for you your honor, and the HENRYS.

X

JUDGE BOYER MUST RECUSE/DISQUALIFY HERSELF DUE TO ILLEGALLY COMPLETED/REPORTED CFA-4 REPORT/ PERJURY.
I HAVE BEEN ACTIVE IN LOCAL POLITICS AND HAVE PERSONALLY FILED AND REPORTED OVER A DOZEN CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTS.
none have been questioned. I raise and spend very little- typically less than $200 (two hundred dollars), definitely less than $500 (five hundred dollars)

since 2010; after winning democrat party nomination for sheriff; and 2014- I started reporting 100- 200 dollars of "unitemized expenses"- as based on personal experience- that despite campaigning primarily via INTERNET/SOCIAL MEDIA- I still spend/expend money/resources- electricyt; internet provider; some telephone calls; office spade; and so on- Items the IRS AND IND. DEPT. OF REVENUE would itemize as home office expenses.

therefore I REASONABLY QUESTION THE ZERO DOLLARS RAISED AND EXPENDED FOR JUDGE BOYERS ELECTION CAMPAIGN.
SEE FORM HERE: 1 OF 2

X X JUDGE BOYER CFA- 2 OF 2

X signed and sworn/affirmed/attested.. read "warning" at bottom of form with respect to improper/fraudulent/ perjury filed CFA's.
I REASONABLY QUESTION THIS CFA. AND JUDGE BOYERS CFA INFORMATION AS WRONGLY FILED.
PER:
Matter of Drury, 602 NE 2d 1000 - Ind: Supreme Court 1992
JUDGES AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS
*1011 The requirement that judges report their financial transactions is designed to protect the litigants and lawyers who appear before such judges. Statements of Economic Interests alert parties to the potential prejudices of judges, thereby creating a checks and balances system which promotes an objective judiciary and enhances the perception of fairness in the courts. Failure to correctly report financial transactions as required is more than a bureaucratic misstep: it is a breach of the system by which we, as judges, maintain our honesty.
x
X
HERE COME DE JUDGE

1] Jud. Canon 5 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD REGULATE HIS EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF CONFLICT WITH HIS JUDICIAL DUTIES.

C. FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES.

(4) Neither a judge nor a member of his family residing in his household should accept a gift, bequest, favor, or loan from anyone except as follows:

[2] Jud. Canon 3 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF HIS OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY.

C. DISQUALIFICATION.

(1) A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned... .

[3] Jud. Canon 1 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY.

[4] Jud. Canon 2 provides in relevant part:

A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL HIS ACTIVITIES.

A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CARRIE HAWK GUTMAN:
:

X

X
DAVID HAWK- REPRESENTS VARIOUS FORT WAYNE GOVERNMENT INTERESTS- INCLUDING THE CITY UTILITIES/HUNTERTOWN LEGAL ISSUE.
X
MS HAWK-GUTMAN
SERVES ON PARK BOARD WITH A HENRY FAMILY BUSINESS SYNDICATE MEMBER

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION BY GILMORE HAYNIE; PRINCIPLE OF HAYNIE HAWK ETC- OF WHICH CARRIE HAWK GUTMAN IS EMPLOYED AND WHO ALSO ALLEN COUNTY ELECTION BOARD MEMBER ATTY.

CONTRIBUTION TO HENRY REELECTION CAMPAIGN- RESPONDENT THOMAS C. CHARLES/CHRISTOPHER/ TOM HENRY

THE HENRY FAMILY BUSINESS SYNDICATE HAS SEVERAL LEGAL INTERESTS REPRESENTED BY THIS LAW FIRM; TO BE POSTED further down in this post.

X
HENRY HOLDINGS- LAW FIRM MEMBER IS AN INCORPORATOR.
"Corporations are people too my friend- Mitt Romney"
X

X
HENRY HOLDINGS-
A BUSINESS REPRESENTED BY THE LAW FIRM HAWK HAYNIE; ETC;
IS ALSO AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTOR TO THE MAYOR HENRY CAMPAIGN NOTE:GALLANT GROUP- ( MAYOR THOMAS CHARLES HENRY'S BUSINESS.)
X