WE'RE NOT CROOKS, JUST WORLD CLASS KLEPTOCRATS
WHAT DID HE KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT? WELL:
funnny- mayor Tom Henry said the same thing..
"
ILBA meeting yesterday
Tom Henry spoke yesterday at the Indiana Licensed Beverage Association meeting.
Here’s a few snippets:
If elected he will stop the “laying-in-wait-police” outside bars. He was in favor of reducing the alcohol limit from 0.10 to 0.08.
He sympathized with the bar owners because he says his wife isn’t making money on her investment in the Green Frog Tavern, and that he has lost money in his insurance business as a result of the smoking ban.
Henry said the City government could only do so much about local gambling. But he did say he would fight to prevent the city from issuing new low-cost liquor licenses being issued in the downtown area. He said the State was at fault for the gambling issues with the local bars.
He also stated the current mayor “at least he had guts” to say something needed to be done downtown (read:Harrison Square)
AWB"
X
With 7 democrats out of a total of 10 candidates being endorsed it shouldn’t surprise anyone when you consider the fact that Cindy Henry, Tom Henry’s wife is the secretary of the ILBA District 4.
X
http://fortwayneindiana.blogspot.com/2007/10/ilba-endorsements-for-municipal.html
X
TOM HENRY SPEAKS ON SOME ISSUES:
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/henrys-negative-campaign/
X
X
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/random-thought-for-the-day/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/the-leftards-have-a-mayoral-candidate/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/the-peter-hart-tom-henry-poll/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/cindy-henry-the-green-frog-inn-and-the-angel-of-death/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/knuth-calls-for-tom-henry-to-resign-really/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/tom-henry-poll-in-3rd-district/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/just-checking-the-wind/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/letter-to-the-editor-6-2/
steve shine letter
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/henry-runs-off-academy-board-members/
tom henry and public safety academy
strip joints and smoking ban:
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/convicted-felon-endorses-henry-for-mayor/
posters comparing Crawford to a nazi- smoking ban
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/cindy-henry-the-green-frog-inn-and-the-angel-of-death/
strip clubs ilba and smoking ban
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/politics-gets-dirty-with-entry-of-filth-industry/
strippers for jesus
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/city-of-strip-clubs-and-churches/
http://fortwayneindiana.blogspot.com/2007/07/smoking-ban-resurfaces-at-city-council.html
http://fortwayneindiana.blogspot.com/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/who-is-the-real-mikeal-vaughn/
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/republicans-for-henry-blog/
heather shoegler
X
POLITICAL SIDEBAR
une 20, 2007
I am writing to you on behalf of Heather Schoegler and in regards to the material that you have recently published through your web page at the following address:http://www.angrywhiteboy.org/index.php/2007/06/19/just-who-publishes-the-republicans-for-henry-blog/These communications are false and defamatory. As one who has elected to pursue, at least, the hobby of public communication, I am sure that you are well-aware that defamation is that which tends to injure reputation or to diminish esteem, respect, good will, or confidence in a person, or to excite derogatory feelings or opinions about such person. See McQueen v. Fayette County Sch. Corp., 711 N.E.2d 62, 65 (Ind. App.1999).Moreover, since you have developed your web page to focus on your political motivations, I assume that you are aware that you are not afforded the same protections when your communications are made regarding a private individual than they would be in regards to a public figure. Indeed, in order for a private individual to recover in defamation, she need not show “actual malice.†Beeching v. Levee, 764 N.E.2d 669(Ind.App., 2002). A communication is per se defamatory where it imputes misconduct in a person’s trade or occupation. Rambo v. Cohen, 587 N.E.2d 140 (Ind.App. 1992).This will be my one and only request that you remove and recant the false and defamatory publications regarding Heather Schoegler. Rest assured I will not extend this courtesy in the future.Michael Barranda
So, it’s not my opinion Mr Barranda.
Peace-out / AWB
X
was that barranda or "barracuda"? Since when was expressing your opinion in public a civil or criminal offense against the laws? Its the same as sitting in a public bar, or anywhere, and stating "I think so-and-so is a jackass".. So-and-so is a jackass because.. clarifies the reasons for you opinion.
i'm going to copy these legal citations, and use them to sue the Journal-Gazette Publishers, and Owners, and editors, then- Inskeeps, Hayes, davis, Klugman, warner, Gray: and the jerks at the NS, as well- Jarosh, Mayes, Ankenburck, and trakc down the editors, and publishers responsible for defaming me, and dragging me through the mud unapologetically, maliciously, politically, and so on.
hmm. If things go will, I'll end up like melvin in Office space, swilling margaritas on some tropical beach..
i'm going to copy these legal citations, and use them to sue the Journal-Gazette Publishers, and Owners, and editors, then- Inskeeps, Hayes, davis, Klugman, warner, Gray: and the jerks at the NS, as well- Jarosh, Mayes, Ankenburck, and trakc down the editors, and publishers responsible for defaming me, and dragging me through the mud unapologetically, maliciously, politically, and so on.
hmm. If things go will, I'll end up like melvin in Office space, swilling margaritas on some tropical beach..
And blogs are exempt, due to experssing opinion- aparrently, mr. legal "Barracude never read about satire, parody, humor, opinion, and the
Indiana constitution Atricle 1, section 9-
Section 9. Freedom of thought and speech
Section 9. No law shall be passed, restraining the free interchange of thought and opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print, freely, on any subject whatever: but for the abuse of that right, every person shall be responsible.
Indiana constitution Atricle 1, section 9-
Section 9. Freedom of thought and speech
Section 9. No law shall be passed, restraining the free interchange of thought and opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print, freely, on any subject whatever: but for the abuse of that right, every person shall be responsible.
Section 10. Libal, truth as defense
Section 10. In all prosecutions for libel, the truth of the matters alleged to be libellous, may be given in justification.
http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/inconst/art-…
If anything anybody says in a blog, is disagreed with by someone else, we will have so many lawyers tying up the courts with frivolous lawsuits, that it will clog the courts..
Stand your ground. this is america- if everybody has to check with a lawyer before saying or writing anything, well…The thought police, and blog-Nazis will have won, and we might as well all start singing "deutsch land uber alles"
Section 10. In all prosecutions for libel, the truth of the matters alleged to be libellous, may be given in justification.
http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/inconst/art-…
If anything anybody says in a blog, is disagreed with by someone else, we will have so many lawyers tying up the courts with frivolous lawsuits, that it will clog the courts..
Stand your ground. this is america- if everybody has to check with a lawyer before saying or writing anything, well…The thought police, and blog-Nazis will have won, and we might as well all start singing "deutsch land uber alles"
↓
X
X
X
CINDY HENRY ILBA 4TH CHAIR WOMAN
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/a-note-on-the-ilba-endorsements/
CINDY HENRY ILBA 4TH CHAIR WOMAN
http://www.rejectingthepremise.com/a-note-on-the-ilba-endorsements/
X
No comments:
Post a Comment